[ Editorials | Departments and Series | Index ]

 

Editorial NOVEMBER 2006


Ovarian Cancer: It’s Time to Act

Lee P. Shulman, MD

Ovarian cancer kills. Each year in the United States, more than 25,000 women are diagnosed with this insidious disease, and 16,000 women die from it. This is not a great epiphany to any of you who read The Female Patient, but it has been a fact of life for patients and health care professionals for too long a time. Great strides have been made in detecting breast, cervical, and endometrial cancer in earlier—and far more treatable—stages. Indeed, we have recently seen the introduction of a vaccine against certain human papillomavirus (HPV) subtypes that can prevent cervical dysplasia and cancer and anogenital warts in “naïve” women with no previous HPV exposure, and reduce their occurrence in non-naïve women.

The facts about ovarian cancer have not changed markedly over the past decades. Very simply, if epithelial ovarian cancer is detected early, then the chance of long-term survival is excellent. However, the vast majority of cases are detected after the malignancy has spread outside the pelvis, and such cases are characterized by poor outcomes despite the best efforts of gynecologic oncologists and the development of new surgical and chemotherapeutic approaches.

The late detection of ovarian cancer is primarily due to the absence of specific symptoms associated with early disease and the lack of a test or screening/diagnostic algorithm for effective early detection. Whereas breast cancer can be detected with mammography, endometrial cancer with endometrial biopsy, and cervical cancer with the Papanicolaou smear and HPV typing, diagnosis of ovarian cancer relies on ultrasonography and nonspecific serum markers—both of which have poor positive predictability.

Recently, OB/GYNs have been bombarded with mass e-mailings about women diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer—the message being that if they had been offered ultrasonography or a CA-125 assay, the cancer would have been detected at an earlier, more treatable stage. Unfortunately, this is not true. While there are cases of serendipitous detection of ovarian cancers with ultrasonography or an elevated CA-125 value, most such findings lead not to early detection, but to unnecessary interventions.

Without the requisite tools, what are we to do? Firstly, we must talk with our patients to ascertain their risk of ovarian cancer in terms of family history. We must become better listeners; when the nonspecific symptoms of early ovarian cancer—eg, bloating, unexplained weight gain/loss, back pain, adnexal mass—present as relatively new complaints, timely recognition could lead to appropriate evaluation and early detection. Secondly (and possibly more importantly), we must recognize that while we cannot screen for incipient ovarian cancer, we do have the tools to prevent it. The literature clearly shows that the use of oral contraceptives (OCs) is highly effective in reducing the incidence of ovarian cancer, as is tubal ligation in women who have completed childbearing. These points should be raised early in the reproductive years with women who are at increased risk for ovarian cancer, as long-term use of OCs—along with pregnancy and breast-feeding—have been shown to reduce the rate of ovarian cancer by up to 60%, even in women carrying breast cancer gene mutations.1,2

Thirdly, we must strongly encourage governmental and private support for research into the development of more effective screening and therapeutic modalities. Dilgeet Singh, MD, and I codirect the Northwestern Ovarian Cancer Early Detection and Prevention Program, a large early-detection program for ovarian cancer that has benefited from generous contributions from the National Institutes of Health and private foundations including Friends of Prentice, the Northwestern Memorial Foundation, Bears Care, and the Kaplan Family Foundation. These organizations have supported the scientific, clinical, research, and educational missions of this program, and its physicians and patients are indebted to them. Other, similar programs throughout the United States need your support—from referral of patients to financial contributions—to expedite our common goal of lifting the death sentence from women diagnosed with ovarian cancer.

We have made great progress in the care and treatment of women with many types of gynecologic cancer. We are not where we want to be, but we are moving forward. However, we have not yet begun to move forward with ovarian cancer, although promising research with proteomics, serum markers, and novel chemotherapeutic regimens gives reason to hope. We owe it to our patients to make sure that this hope becomes a promise, and soon.

Lee P. ShuLman, MD
Associate Editor

back to top



References

  1. Narod SA, Risch H, Moslehi R, et al. Oral contraceptives and the risk of hereditary ovarian cancer. Hereditary Ovarian Cancer Clinical Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(7):424-428.
  2. Hanna L, Adams M. Prevention of ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20(2):339-362.

back to top


 

 

[ Home | CME/CE | Product News | Author Guidelines ]
[ Editorial Board | Reprints/Permissions | Archives | Circulation | Classifieds | Our Services ]


Copyright ©2000-2010 Quadrant HealthCom Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The information provided on femalepatient.com is for educational purposes only. Use of this Web site is subject to the medical disclaimer and privacy policy.