[ Editorials | Letters | Selected Articles | Signature Series | Patient Handouts | Index ]

Letter to the Editor

Primary Care June 2005


To the Editor:

I would like Dr Nolan to consider “patient safety” to be his cornerpiece— not access. There is no access problem until we are all out of business. Patient safety debunks the myth that tort law is a patient safety system.

JOHN LEWIS, MD
Waterbury, Conn


To the Editor:

Every issue contains the section on “What Your Patients Are Reading,” and in the April issue, one of the magazines that you covered was Glamour.

Glamour is a magazine that promotes gender bias against male physicians, especially male gynecologists. This was reported in the November 2004 Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.1

When the writers for Glamour print an article relating to obstetrics and gynecology, they identify the gender of an obstetrician/ gynecologist to be a female in 86% of the cases with 14% of the descriptive terms being gender-neutral. As also noted in the above journal article, when the gender of a physician other than obstetrician/gynecologist was identified as male, that physician was portrayed in a negative light 100% of the time.

The writing staff of Glamour is also involved in the disturbing practice of changing gender-neutral quotes of physicians to female specific quotes.

The April 2004 issue of Cosmopolitan ran an article entitled “The Bad Things Some Doctors Do,”2 which described the sexual misconduct of only male physicians. Although obstetrician/ gynecologists were the main focus of the article, the male family practitioner was also painted as a person to be suspected, as noted by the following quote:

But it’s just not gynecologists who are crossing the line. Trusted family docs, often taking advantage of a long-term patient-physician relationship, have been charged with crimes. In these cases, victims are often unsure of what to do because they don’t expect their doctor to behave malevolently towards them.2
I think it is time for the editors of The Female Patient to consider identifying and reporting to its readership articles that portray male physicians, and especially male obstetrician/gynecologists, in a negative light. Since this is very destructive to the patientphysician relationship, it is essential that physicians are made aware of “What Your Patients Are Reading”.

LARRY KINCHELOE, MD
Oklahoma City, Okla


References

  1. Kincheloe LR. Gender bias against male obstetrician-gynecologists in women’s magazines. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(5 Pt 1):1089-1093.
  2. Cooper A. The bad things some doctors do. Cosmopolitan. 2005;238(4): 150-153.

back to top


[ Home | CME/CE | Product News | Author Guidelines ]
[ Editorial Boards | Reprints/Permissions | Archives | Circulation | Classifieds | Our Services ]


Copyright ©2000-2008 Quadrant HealthCom Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The information provided on femalepatient.com is for educational purposes only. Use of this Web site is subject to the medical disclaimer and privacy policy.