[ Editorials | Departments and Series | Index ]

 

Sexual Health & Intimacy

Quality of Life and the Meaning of Sexuality

Mitchell Tepper, PhD, MPH

Traditional measurements of quality of life (QOL) include a social integration factor (eg, the number of friends contacted per month); sexual health and sexual relations are not measured. Social integration does not measure relationship satisfaction. People can be socially integrated but still feel emotionally isolated.

According to Gill and Feinstein,1 QOL, as defined and experienced by an individual with a disability, was extremely important; sometimes more important than employment, income, or functional measures. In a study by Johnson and colleagues,2 32 participants out of 126 who were assessed 1 year after their injury consistently gave low satisfaction ratings to love and sexuality: a topic not even addressed in the conventional questionnaire about community integration. The authors concluded, "To understand quality of life, more information on private activities, including intimate relationships and sexuality, may be needed."

Another important element of QOL ignored in traditional measurements is spirituality.3 A colleague recently told me he believed sexuality and spirituality were two different and unrelated things. He said sex is of the flesh and spirituality is something else. I disagreed. My perspective is based on the philosophy, history, science, medicine, psychology, and human experience of sex. An important emergent theme from my research on pleasure and orgasm in people with spinal cord injuries (SCI) is what I call connectedness.

When people are asked about the effects of SCI on their sexual response or activity, they responded that they no longer felt the same or "normal." Diminished sensation, lack of escalating arousal, and an inability to orgasm made masturbation as well as sex with a partner seem pointless, reaffirmed unexpressed beliefs of asexuality, and led to feelings of "why bother?"

There was a need to be with a trusted sexual partner for safe sexual exploration and peak sexual experience, including pleasure and orgasm. The most pervasive reasons were the excitement gained from pleasing or satisfying a partner, feelings of connectedness or complementary sexual energies, and identifying sex with a sense of intimacy and as an expression of love rather than a pleasurable release. These findings led to my theory on sexual pleasure and orgasm in people with SCI: the ability to experience orgasm in people with SCI is the culmination of a process of sexual self-discovery that is haphazard and reflects how they learned about sexuality before their injury.

SEXUAL SELF-DISCOVERY

This process of sexual self-discovery includes reestablishing a sexual relationship with oneself and others in the context of a changed body, changed life, and changed interpersonal relationships. This process unfolds over time with the ability of participants to move from what they described as "sexually devastated" after injury to "ecstatically orgasmic" years later.

When people focus their attention on the details, they miss the essence of the phenomenon. Looking only at the physical, they miss the reflection on a spiritual level. Spiritually, humans yearn to feel as one with another. When they are at one with another, they feel whole, that what they have to offer has value, and they feel desirable and worthy of love.

CONNECTEDNESS

Three elements generate euphoria, ecstasy, and bliss. Being "timeless," one is in the moment, not comparing to past experience or focusing on future expectations. Being "egoless," one becomes one with his or her partner or the universe, not an individual limited by physical disability or negative thoughts. Being in the "natural state," described by the Indian religious leader Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, "The unreal is lost; the facade, the face, are lost; the society, the culture, the civilization are lost. You are part of nature, as trees are, animals are, stars are. You are in a greater something: the cosmos." You are connected to the universe.

" All I know is that I am miserable"
A wife wrote to me in desperation asking for help for her husband who had sustained a SCI a year after they were married.

"He said that he pretty much is not interested in sex anymore" (Avoidance). "I try to be understanding and assure him that to be even cuddled or for him to hold my hand and talk a bit would be wonderful, but he refuses to even do that" (More avoidance). "He does not touch me at all" (Disconnection). "When I go up to even hug him good-bye he pushes me away as soon as he can" (Anger). "I have begged him to go to marriage counseling with me to get help but he refuses" (Arrogance). "This has gone on for years and to be honest I feel like I am going to go insane. His refusal to even try to work on our problems has made me resentful and I have stopped even trying" (Created a barrier to human relationships). "I live in one part of the house and he lives in the other and we don't spend time together at all without fighting. I just don't know what to do anymore. All I know is that I am miserable." This marriage ultimately ended in divorce.

Common reactions to loss associated with acquired disabilities include avoidance, anger, a loss of sense of self, and an inability to let go of the past and move on. Ego, arrogance, avoidance, anger, and complaints are all barriers to establishing a sense of connectedness that is central to healthy sexual relationships.

Where does the answer lie?
If disconnection and factors that result in disconnection are barriers to intimate sexual relations, and intimate connected relationships are important to QOL, where does the answer lie?

According to Ray Stubbs, author of The Essential Tantra, sensuality, sexuality, and spirituality begin within. Barriers to these experiences during sex include concentrating too much on performance and not enough on sensations, judging others, making comparisons with the past to invalidate the present, and focusing on expectations instead of the richness of the moment. Allowing, rather than striving, is the key to acknowledging that the medical model of sexual relating does not bind us.

THE ART OF LOVING

What balances the physical and spiritual is the artistry of love richly detailed by Erich Fromm in his 1956 book, The Art of Loving. Whipple and Komisaruk4 define love as "having stimulation that one desires." This definition encompasses having an emotional bond with a person for whom one yearns, as well as having sensory stimulation that one desires. They concluded, "The better is our understanding of love, the greater is our respect for the significance and potency of its role in mental and physical health."

CONCLUSION

Spiritual aspects of sexuality transcend the physical and the knowable. In a spiritual sense, the meaning and purpose of sexuality can be conceived as a means of connection.

In an ideal world, humans learn to love others and themselves without input from their genitals, without any pressure from outside sources to perform sexually or to be physically perfect. They learn about sex and sexuality from family, schools, and religious institutions that reinforce the concepts of intentional love, understanding and valuing uniqueness, acceptance, and connectedness. Without input from the genitals, it becomes easier to see the emotional and spiritual aspects of sexuality.

If pleasurable sexual sensations are introduced from the genitals, this gives positive reinforcement experienced through the body and appreciated in the mind. The physical and pleasurable aspects of sex become important and provide added joy to the emotional and spiritual.

If the pleasurable genital sensations were taken away, one would experience great loss. Yet, the emotional and spiritual aspects of sexuality still exist, from which we relearn ways to experience physical pleasure. Just as we learned to experience pleasurable sensations from our genital experience we can learn to experience pleasure from other parts of the body, both physical and energetic. We learn truth from the greater culture that sex is purely about pleasure in the genitals. When that focus is missing, we learn another truth about sexuality.


Mitchell Tepper, PhD, MPH, is founder and president of The Sexual Health Network and www.SexualHealth.com.

References

  1. Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. JAMA. 1994;272 (8):619-626.
  2. Johnston M, Nissim EN, Wood K, et al. Objective and subjective handicap following spinal cord injury: interrelationships and predictors. J Spinal Cord Med. 2002;25(1):11-22.
  3. Ogden G. Integrating sexuality and spirituality: a group therapy approach to women's sexual dilemmas. In: Kleinplatz P, ed. New Directions in Sex Therapy. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge; 2001:322-346.
  4. Komisaruk BR, Whipple B. Love as sensory stimulation: physiological consequences of its deprivation and expression. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1998;23(8):927-944.

back to top


[ Home | CME/CE | Product News | Author Guidelines ]
[ Editorial Board | Reprints/Permissions | Archives | Circulation | Classifieds | Our Services ]


Copyright ©2000-2008 Quadrant HealthCom Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The information provided on femalepatient.com is for educational purposes only. Use of this Web site is subject to the medical disclaimer and privacy policy.