|
Images
in Women's Health
September 2003
Tyler Muffly, BA; Jay Goldberg, MD;
Barry Goldberg, MD
Case
A 39-year-old gravida 2 para 0010 at 16 weeks of gestation presented
to the office complaining of severe left lower abdominal pain,
which was acute in onset. She had undergone a laparoscopic myomectomy
2 years previously to remove a 9-cm anterior and a 5-cm posterior
leiomyoma. An ultrasound 1 week prior to presentation visualized
three anterior leiomyomata measuring 3.1 x 2.3 x 2.2 cm, 2.6 x
2.2 x 2.2 cm, and 1.8 x 1.4 x 2.0 cm (Figure 1). On examination,
the pain was localized to the anterior uterus. Rebound tenderness
and guarding were noted, but the bowel sounds were active and normal.
She was afebrile without any other abnormal clinical findings.
Her white blood cell count and the differential were normal.
|

Click
to enlarge |
Figure
1. Pelvic ultrasound 1 week prior to presentation,
visualizing three anterior uterine leiomyomata. |
Ultrasound with color Doppler showed an area anteriorly in the
uterine fundus appearing to be a fluid-filled cavity in the uterine
wall, possibly representing a uterine rupture and central cystic
changes in one of the leiomyomata (Figure 2). Given the sonographic
change in appearance from the previous week, her prior surgical
myomectomy, and her clinical presentation, the authors thought
uterine rupture to be the most likely diagnosis.
|

Click
to enlarge |
Figure
2. Pelvic ultrasound showing (A) a fluid filled area
superior to, and (B) central cystic changes within the previously
visualized leiomyomata. |
With her symptoms worsening, she was immediately taken to the
operating room for a diagnostic laparoscopy. On initial visualization,
there appeared to be an area of uterine rupture with membranes
protruding through the myometrium (Figure 3). This finding was
verified by several physicians. After converting to laparotomy,
what had appeared to be the area of rupture was actually a large
subserosal fluid collection, which spontaneously ruptured. The
myometrium was intact. The authors then determined that the fluid
collection was most likely transudate caused by inflammation from
underlying leiomyoma degeneration and necrosis. The authors noted
no other abnormal findings.
|

Click
to enlarge |
Figure
3. Laparoscopic visualization of a subserosal fluid
collection on left anterior uterus mistaken for an area of
rupture with protruding membranes. |
Three days later, after initially improving clinically, her lower
abdominal pain worsened. A computed tomography scan of the abdomen
and pelvis had no findings to explain her symptoms. The next day,
she was noted to have premature rupture of membranes, with prolapse
of the umbilical cord. A dilation and evacuation was performed
uneventfully. Following the dilation and evacuation, her condition
quickly improved. She was discharged home 2 days later.
Discussion
Standard management of leiomyoma degeneration in pregnancy is
primarily supportive, including analgesics, ice to the abdomen,
and bed rest. As it is normally a self-limiting process, further
intervention is usually unnecessary. The diagnosis of leiomyoma
degeneration is often one of exclusion, with the differential diagnosis
including chorioamnionitis, ovarian torsion, appendicitis, preterm
labor, abruption, and uterine rupture.
The combination of a prior laparoscopic myomectomy, localized
pain acute in onset at the site of a uterine scar, the sonographic
findings, and an acute abdomen, made uterine rupture initially
a likely diagnosis in this patient. Although rare, uterine rupture
during the second trimester has been reported following laparoscopic
myomectomy.1 As seen in Figure 3, laparoscopic
visualization of the subserosal fluid collection overlying the
area of fibroid degeneration fooled several physicians, appearing
to be an area of complete uterine dehiscence with protruding membranes.
Physiologically, the inflammation from the necrosing leiomyoma
most likely led to the accumulation of the overlying subserosal
fluid collection. As no fluid collection was sonographically seen
1 week before, the authors concluded that it was directly caused
by the underlying leiomyoma degeneration and associated inflammation.
The authors cannot determine what contribution toward the premature
rupture of membranes can be separately attributed to the fibroid
degradation and the surgical intervention.
Uterine Leiomyomata
Uterine leiomyomata is the most common tumor of the female reproductive
tract; it affects approximately 20% of women aged more than 35
years.2 Leiomyomas during pregnancy
have been shown to be associated with a number of complications:
degeneration, premature rupture of membranes, preterm delivery,
malpresentation, dystocia, placental abruption, and postpartum
hemorrhage. Red or hemorrhagic degeneration, the most common complication
associated with leiomyomata during pregnancy, most commonly occurs
around the 20th week.3 Degeneration
of leiomyomas during pregnancy is usually a self-limiting process,
with reported complications including infection, preterm labor,
and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy.4
Tyler Muffly, BA, is fourth-year medical student, Jay
Goldberg, MD, is clinical assistant professor, Department
of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Barry Goldberg, MD, is
professor, Department of Radiology, all at Jefferson Medical College,
Philadelphia, Pa.
References
- Dubuisson JB, Fauconnier
A, Deffarges JV, et al. Pregnancy outcome and deliveries following
laparoscopic myomectomy. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15(4):869-873.
- Floridon
C, Lund N, Thomsen S. Alternative treatment for symptomatic
fibroids. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;13(5):491-495.
- Carlan SJ, O’Brien
WF, Holbrook J, et al. Cystic degeneration of a leiomyoma masquerading
as a postoperative abscess. Am J Perinatol. 1992;9(3): 175-178.
- Makar AP, Meulyzer
PR, Vergote IB, et al. A case report of unusual complication
of myomatous uterus in pregnancy: spontaneous perforation of
myoma after red degeneration. Euro J Obstet Gynecol Reprod
Biol. 1989; 31(3):289-293.
back to top
|