|
LEGALEASE
Liability Exposure
Reduction Strategies
Ronald T. Burkman, MD; John G. Bagley, JD
In past issues, we have concentrated on the processes involved in a lawsuit,
including the filing, the discovery phase, approaches to non-trial resolution,
and the trial phase. This article revisits some of the basics that may
reduce your chance of going though this lengthy, expensive, usually
unrewarding, and often uncomfortable process. The focus will be on adverse
outcomes,
since such events lead to exposure which could ultimately result in
legal proceedings.
Although there are many approaches, here are a few general tips for preventing
liability exposure:
- Prevent the likelihood of an adverse outcome.
- Communicate more effectively within the health care team and with patients.
- Recover if an adverse outcome occurs.
For the most part, all 3 areas overlap. For example, preventing adverse
outcomes may depend on communication. Furthermore, because not all adverse
outcomes can be prevented, a recovery approach may be needed, and it may
require a communication strategy.
back to top
ADVERSE OUTCOME PREVENTION STRATEGIES
Certainly the old adage, “an ounce of prevention is worth
a pound of cure” holds true with regard to adverse outcomes
and the potential for malpractice lawsuits. There are many ways
to put this into practice. On a regular basis, perhaps annually,
do a critical analysis of your practice’s strengths and weaknesses.
Solicit a colleague to contribute input. If a significant weakness
is identified, remediate it through a CME program or through mentoring.
Alternatively, that aspect of practice can be conceded. For example,
if you have difficulty with urogynecologic procedures due to low
volume, it may be appropriate to refer applicable patients to a
partner who has a higher volume or more experience. As a corollary,
everyone should be aware of their limitations and obtain help or
consultation earlier rather than later in a patient’s course.
When a new technique is introduced, perform cases with someone credentialed
in the procedure until you are comfortable performing them alone.
If possible, use simulation to practice the procedure. In high risk
areas such as obstetrics, it is important to promote the use of
crew resource management or team training as part of a culture of
error reduction. Certainly at the very least, clinicians and their
staff should consider simulating obstetric emergencies such as shoulder
dystocia, abnormal fetal heart rates, and hemorrhage. Rely on approaches
that are evidence-based as much as possible: they are more likely
to be effective and safe.
Every practice should also examine whether on-call hours are excessive
relative to the practice’s volumes. Although the focus to
date has been on limiting work hours for residents-in-training,
this may encompass all health care professionals in the not-too-distant
future. If working excessive hours is deemed unsafe or risky for
young health care professionals, how can a different standard be
justified for their older peers, particularly those with busy practices?
back to top
Communication Strategies
Appropriate communication is essential in every practice at various levels. When
interacting with patients, allot them enough time to describe their concerns
without interruption. This requires the development of good listening skills,
since impatience and overbearing directives may give the impression that you
have less concern for a patient’s particular issues. Every planned procedure
or surgery should be explained in detail, including risks and benefits. When
appropriate, providing supplementary reading material can also be helpful. Encourage
questions, and even try querying patients to confirm their understanding of key
points. Although the patient’s autonomy in any decision-making processes
should be maximized, try to recommend reasonable options rather than presenting
a “menu” from which the patient chooses without any direction. If
a serious complication or unanticipated outcome occurs, be honest with the patient
and discuss what happened.
Another important aspect of communication is with other practitioners and staff.
Adequate chart documentation is a vital component of communication and may aid
in avoiding medical errors and unnecessary procedures. Additionally, it is useful
to review some of the communication concepts taught in team training, such as:
- The 2 challenge rule: a team member voices a concern 2 times to ensure it has
been heard.
- Check-backs: orders are verbally repeated or questioned when unclear, increasing
the margin of safety from an operational standpoint.
If there is concern about liability, the risk management staff of a hospital
can assist in formulating communication plan appropriate for the circumstances.
back to top
Recovery Strategies
There are useful strategies that may help a health care professional
recover should an adverse event occur. The first is an adequate recovery
strategy, or taking actions necessary to resolve the problem and minimize
any permanent
consequences. Liberal use of consultants can be beneficial, since
a lack of emotional involvement enables them to be more objective.
Once the situation is under reasonable control, openly discuss the
adverse event with the patient. Such discussions should be carefully planned
and involve several members of the health care team to ensure the information
is complete and does not conflict with what others have said. Any discussions
with the patient should be documented, including a list of all attendees and
what was discussed.
In instances where avoidable errors have been made, an apology can
be crucial. Although it may be difficult, a sincere apology helps rebuild
a doctor-patient relationship. However, an apology requires some planning;
assistance from risk managers will be especially helpful in this regard.
back to top
CONCLUSION
The initial prevention of adverse events, open communication with
patients and among the health care team, and successful recovery from adverse
events are strategies that may limit the likelihood of liability exposure.
Using evidence-based information to guide treatment and seeking assistance
when necessary (either from colleagues during a new procedure or from a
risk management team after adverse events have occurred) provide many liability
prevention benefits.
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest in relation
to this article.
back to top
Ronald T. Burkman, MD, is Professor,
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School
of Medicine, Boston, MA; Division of General Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Baystate Medical
Center, Springfield, MA; and Editor-in-Chief, The Female Patient.
John G. Bagley, JD, is Senior Partner, Morrison Mahoney LLP, Springfield,
MA.
SUGGESTED READING
- Charles SC, Frisch PR, Lumalcuri J, Strunk
AL. From the Exam Room to Courtroom: Navigating Litigation
and Coping
with Stress—A CD-ROM. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians
and Gynecologists; 2006.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Professional
Liability
and Risk Management: An Essential Guide for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Washington,
DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2006.
- Morey JC, Salisbury M. Introducing Teamwork Training into Healthcare Organizations:
Implementation Issues and Solutions. Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of
the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2002 Sep 29-Oct 4; Baltimore, MD. Santa
Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2002.
- Woods JR, Rozovsky FA. What Do I Say? Communicating Intended or Unanticipated
Outcomes in Obstetrics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003.
back to top
|